Associated with Alexandria and above all with Origen, who read scripture on a literal, a moral and a spiritual level. Antioch preferred to stay nearer the plain sense. Modern readers are usually taught to distrust allegory, though the line between it and typology is thinner than the textbooks let on.
Books in the Greek Old Testament that are not in the Hebrew Bible.
More about Apocrypha
Catholic churches receive them as scripture and call them deuterocanonical. The Orthodox churches receive them too, on a slightly longer list and usually under a different name. Protestant churches do not, though the Reformers valued them for reading and early Protestant Bibles printed them. Jerome raised the question when he translated from the Hebrew, and Augustine disagreed with him about it.
From apologia, a speech for the defence in court, which is how 1 Peter 3:15 uses it. The second century apologists, Justin above all, were writing to the emperor and to the educated public. Nothing in the word has anything to do with apologising.
The canon was recognised rather than decreed. Books already being read everywhere, and traceable back to the apostolic circle, settled into place over roughly three centuries. Athanasius in 367 gives the first surviving list that matches the present New Testament exactly.
Teaching someone the faith, usually before they are baptised.
More about Catechesis
The early church took it very seriously. The catechumenate could run for years, and it ended with a formal handing over of the creed. The Reformation catechisms, Luther's, Heidelberg and Westminster, are the same instinct put into print.
The doctrine of the person of Christ. Who he is, rather than what he did.
More about Christology
The classic split is between the person of Christ, which is christology proper, and the work of Christ, which is soteriology. The first five centuries are mostly taken up with the first question, and the great councils are the milestones along the way.
From credo, I believe. A short agreed statement of faith.
More about Creed
Creeds grew out of the questions put to people at baptism, and out of the rule of faith. The Apostles' Creed is western and later than its name suggests. The Nicene Creed comes from councils. The Athanasian Creed is neither by Athanasius nor from a council.
The doctrine of the church. What it is, who belongs, and who leads.
More about Ecclesiology
Most church splits are ecclesiological before they are anything else. The questions keep coming back in the same shape Cyprian and the Donatists met them in. Is the church defined by holiness or by grace? And does the failure of a minister invalidate what he does?
Reading your own meaning into a text. The thing exegesis is supposed to prevent.
More about Eisegesis
Nobody sets out to do it. It is what happens when the conclusion is settled before the reading starts, and it is most dangerous when the conclusion is one you are fond of.
In ordinary Greek it meant a civic gathering, citizens called out to decide something. The Septuagint uses it for the assembly of Israel, and that is the more important background. It never means a building.
The doctrine of last things. Death, judgement, resurrection, new creation.
More about Eschatology
Modern theology has increasingly argued that this is not an appendix at the end of the syllabus but a dimension running through the whole of it. The New Testament treats the last days as already begun in the resurrection and not yet finished, which usually gets called inaugurated eschatology.
The theory of interpretation. The rules you are using, whether you know it or not.
More about Hermeneutics
Exegesis is the act of interpreting a passage. Hermeneutics is the account of how interpretation works at all. Everyone has one. The only question is whether it has ever been looked at.
Of similar being. One Greek letter away from homoousios, and the difference mattered.
More about Homoiousios
The compromise party wanted to say the Son is like the Father in being. Gibbon sneered that the world was convulsed over a single letter. But the argument was about whether the Son is God or the highest of creatures, which is not a small distinction however small the spelling. Many who used the word were not Arians, and Athanasius himself treated them as brothers who meant the right thing badly.
Nicaea picked a word that does not appear in the Bible, which was controversial then and still gets raised as an objection. The council's answer was that the Arians could agree to every biblical phrase while meaning something else by it, so a word was needed that they could not sign. It rules out the idea that the Son is merely very like God.
It originally meant much the same as ousia, which is why the fourth century was so confused. The Cappadocians fixed the distinction. One ousia, three hypostases. In christology the word does different work again, because Chalcedon says the two natures meet in one hypostasis.
Set against didache, which is teaching. The kerygma is the news itself. Christ died, was buried, was raised, appeared. Scholars have tried to reconstruct its earliest shape from formulas buried in the New Testament, especially in 1 Corinthians 15.
The term already carried weight in Greek philosophy, where it named the rational order of the universe. John takes it and says that ordering principle became flesh. Justin and the apologists used the overlap to argue that whatever is true in philosophy already belongs to Christ.
In trinitarian language, God is one ousia. Latin renders it substantia, which is why the western creeds talk about one substance. Part of the confusion in the fourth century was simply linguistic. Greek and Latin speakers were using cognate words for different things.
Presence, or arrival. The New Testament word for the return of Christ.
More about Parousia
In ordinary Greek it described the state visit of a king or a governor to a city, which fits the New Testament use better than the English word coming does. The city goes out to meet the ruler on the road and walks him in.
The study of the church fathers, roughly from the end of the New Testament to the eighth century.
More about Patristics
The boundaries are a convention rather than anything natural. In the west the period is usually closed with Gregory the Great in 604, in the east with John of Damascus in the eighth century. Patrology strictly means the study of the writers and patristics the study of their thought, though in practice the words get used loosely.
The three persons of the Trinity living in one another.
More about Perichoresis
Each person wholly contains and is contained by the others, and none of them loses what makes them distinct. The Latin equivalent is circumincession. It is the answer to the question of how three persons are one God without being three parts of God.
Tertullian brought it in. It originally meant a mask, or a role, which has caused centuries of anxiety that it might suggest God playing three parts. It does not mean person in the modern sense of a separate centre of consciousness. Read it that way and you end up with three gods.
Nicaea in 325 said very little about the Spirit. Basil's On the Holy Spirit and the Council of Constantinople in 381 supplied what was missing. That pneumatology stays thin next to christology is a complaint modern theology keeps making.
The medieval fourfold sense of scripture. Literal, allegorical, moral and anagogical.
More about Quadriga
A four horse chariot, hence the name. The literal sense tells you what happened, the allegorical what to believe, the moral what to do, the anagogical what to hope for. Jerusalem is the worked example everyone uses. A city, the church, the faithful soul, and the heavenly city.
The ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament, written LXX.
More about Septuagint
Made for Greek speaking Jews from the third century BC onwards. It is the version most New Testament writers quote, which is why their Old Testament citations sometimes do not match the Hebrew wording. It also carries a wider book list than the Hebrew Bible.
It is tied at every point to christology. What you think Christ had to be depends on what you think had to be fixed. That is exactly the move Athanasius makes against Arius, and it is why the two doctrines cannot be studied apart.
The word says something about Christ before it says anything about Mary. If the one she bore is God the Son, then she bore God. Nestorius preferred Christotokos, and the council judged that this split Christ into two subjects.
Reading earlier people, events and institutions as patterns that point forward to Christ.
More about Typology
Different from allegory in that typology holds the historical events really happened and really do point forward, rather than standing in for something else. Adam and Christ. The exodus and redemption. The temple and the incarnation. The New Testament does it constantly, which is the main argument for its legitimacy.
When we call God good, the word is not being used exactly as it is of a person, or the creator would be a creature. Nor is it being used with no connection at all, or we would be saying nothing. Aquinas' doctrine of analogy is the classic attempt to hold the middle ground.
A modern collective name, not one they used. Clement of Rome, Ignatius, Polycarp, the Didache, Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas. They are not systematic theologians. They are pastors writing to churches under pressure, and that is what makes them worth reading.
Arius was defending the uniqueness of God, not attacking Christ. But if the Son is created then he shares in God rather than possessing divinity, and he cannot give what he does not have. Athanasius' answer is about salvation. A creature cannot save creatures.
Named for Jacobus Arminius, a Reformed minister trained in Geneva. His followers, the Remonstrants, put five points to the Dutch church in 1610 and the Synod of Dort answered each one. They are not semi-Pelagians. The Remonstrance affirms that a person can do nothing good without grace going before, and the argument is about whether that grace can be refused. Wesley later took up a version of it, which is why the Methodist and Reformed traditions still divide here.
The church has never dogmatised a single theory, which is unusual. Ransom, victory over the powers, satisfaction, penal substitution, moral example, recapitulation. All have been held, often together. The New Testament uses several images at once, and whether one of them is the controlling image is itself part of the argument.
Reading the Bible as one unfolding story, on its own terms and in its own order.
More about Biblical theology
Different from systematic theology, which arranges everything by topic. Biblical theology asks what a book, or a stage of the story, contributes where it stands, and then traces the themes forward. Creation, exile, temple, kingship, covenant. It is the dominant method in a lot of current evangelical scholarship.
It is the standard of christological orthodoxy for Catholic, Orthodox and most Protestant churches. It works largely by exclusion, ruling out the answers that had already failed, and it deliberately does not explain the mechanism. Not all churches received it, and the Oriental Orthodox split dates from here.
The cross as a victory over sin, death and the devil.
More about Christus Victor
Prominent in the early church and in the east. Gustaf Aulen's 1931 book gave it the name and argued it had been wrongly displaced in the west, a historical claim that has been much disputed since. It reads the cross and the resurrection together as a single act of liberation. Many who hold it hold a substitutionary account as well, and do not treat the two as alternatives.
The German Protestants who refused to let the Nazi state define the church.
More about The Confessing Church
Formed in 1934 around the Barmen Declaration, against the German Christians who wanted the church lined up with the regime. Its record is mixed. Plenty of members opposed state control of the church without opposing much else, and only a minority went as far as Bonhoeffer.
Different from a creed in being longer, later and usually denominational. Augsburg, the Thirty Nine Articles, Westminster, the Baptist confessions. Churches tend to write them when they have just divided, or are about to.
The term is polemical, and it comes from John Howard Yoder and the Anabaptist tradition. Yoder's own denomination later documented his record of sustained sexual abuse and harassment of dozens of women over several decades, confirmed by a 2015 peer reviewed historical study. The word names the moment the church stopped being a persecuted minority and started having access to force. Whether 313 was a rescue or a fall is one of the oldest arguments in church history.
The tradition holds two things together. Sudden turnings, like Paul's and Augustine's, and the slow forming of people raised in the faith. Insisting that everyone must have the first kind has caused a great deal of unnecessary anxiety.
The pattern goes back to Acts 15. Seven councils, from Nicaea in 325 to the Second Nicaea in 787, are received as ecumenical by both east and west. The Roman Catholic Church counts twenty one. Which councils count is itself part of the disagreement.
A binding relationship, sworn, with obligations, between God and a people.
More about Covenant
The organising idea of much of the Old Testament, and the frame the New Testament reads it within. Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, and the new covenant in Christ. Whether these are stages of one covenant or genuinely separate arrangements is the fault line between covenant theology and dispensationalism.
Athanasius' famous line is that he became human so that we might become divine. The claim is participation, not absorption. Humanity is taken into the relationship the Son has with the Father, by grace, and the line between creator and creature holds absolutely. It is central to Orthodox theology and it has been recovered in the west over recent decades.
Repentance on its own cannot solve it, because repentance does not undo corruption. Only the Word, taking a body that can die, can satisfy the sentence and remake the nature at the same time. It is the engine of the argument in On the Incarnation.
From the Greek for to seem. If matter is beneath contempt then God cannot really have taken it, so the suffering has to be an appearance. Ignatius attacks it hard on the way to his own death, and 1 John seems to have something like it in view.
The classical form, associated with Wellhausen, identifies J, E, D and P. The consensus behind it has weakened a great deal and few scholars now hold the original version. The underlying question, of how the Pentateuch came together, is still a real one.
A teaching the church has formally defined as binding.
More about Dogma
Narrower than doctrine, which covers Christian teaching in general. The Trinity and the two natures of Christ are dogma. A great deal else is doctrine, held with varying degrees of confidence, and being able to tell the difference is part of growing up theologically.
The African church split over clergy who had handed scriptures to the authorities during the Great Persecution. Augustine's answer was that the sacraments belong to Christ and not to the minister, so their validity does not rest on the minister's holiness. The controversy also moved Augustine, who had opposed coercion, to defend the use of state force against the Donatists. He argued it from the parable's compel them to come in, and it was quoted for centuries afterwards to justify a great deal.
Affirmed at the Third Council of Constantinople in 681. The human will of Christ is genuinely human and genuinely free, and it freely conforms to the divine. It is what Chalcedon was always going to require.
From the Greek for the whole inhabited world. Modern ecumenism grew out of the missionary movement, which found competing denominations impossible to defend on the field. The World Council of Churches and the Second Vatican Council are its landmarks.
Ignatius already assumes a single bishop with presbyters and deacons around him. Cyprian argued that the bishops together hold the church's unity. Whether the arrangement is divinely instituted or a practical development is one of the oldest questions between the churches.
The answer to the Arian claim that begotten has to mean a start. Human begetting happens in time and produces a separate being. Divine begetting does neither. The Son is always Son and the Father is always Father, and neither of them becomes so.
David Bebbington's four marks, conversionism, biblicism, crucicentrism and activism, are still the standard description. It grew out of the eighteenth century revivals, and it runs across denominations rather than being one.
Does the Spirit proceed from the Father, or from the Father and the Son? There are two disputes here, not one. The east objects to the doctrine, holding that the Father alone is the source within the Trinity. And it objects to the procedure, because the west amended an ecumenical creed without an ecumenical council. Rome has since clarified that it does not mean the Spirit has two sources, and the creed is used without the phrase in some Catholic worship. It remains unresolved.
Irenaeus defended it with an argument from the four winds and the four corners of the earth that few now find persuasive. The decision itself has worn far better. Four portraits that differ in detail and agree in substance are harder to explain away than one smoothed narrative.
Almost nobody in the tradition denies that people choose. The argument is about whether a will bent away from God can turn itself back. Augustine said no, Pelagius said yes, Erasmus and Luther fought it out again, and Arminius and Dort after them. Separating freedom from coercion and freedom of inclination takes most of the heat out of it.
A loose family rather than one system. What they share is a lesser and hostile creator god, matter as the problem, and an elite saved by knowing things. Irenaeus saw that the real issue was the story. The gnostics used Christian words inside a completely different plot.
Good news. Originally the announcement of a royal victory, or a new emperor.
More about Gospel
The word euangelion was already in public use for imperial proclamations before the church took it. Applying it to a crucified provincial was a deliberate provocation. It names the announcement first, and only later became the label for the four books that carry it.
The word carries a lot of weight and it does not always carry the same weight. For Augustine it is the power that heals a damaged will. For the medieval schoolmen it can be something infused. For the Reformers it is above all God's disposition towards sinners. Read it carelessly across periods and you will confuse yourself endlessly.
Its force was disputed. Some held it had been discharged by the apostles, which is the view Carey wrote against in 1792. Read alongside Genesis 1:28 it also looks like the renewal of an original commission to fill the earth, which is how biblical theology tends to take it.
Different from lower or textual criticism, which works out the wording. The methods themselves are ordinary historical tools. The controversy is about the assumptions they are sometimes carried out with, particularly where the conclusion about what can happen in history is fixed in advance.
Chalcedon's four adverbs do the work. Without confusion, without change, without division, without separation. The first two protect the distinction of the natures, the second two protect the unity of the person. The definition is a fence, not an explanation.
John of Damascus answered that the incarnation changes the terms. God who could not be pictured has taken visible flesh, so refusing images comes close to denying that. The Second Council of Nicaea in 787 permitted them, drawing a line between veneration and the worship due to God alone. The Reformed churches later rejected images again, arguing from the second commandment rather than from christology. That is a different objection and it needs answering on its own terms.
Something credited to an account that did not earn it.
More about Imputation
In Reformation theology, Adam's sin is imputed to humanity and Christ's righteousness to the believer. Critics call it a legal fiction. Defenders answer that it is no fiction if the person is genuinely united to Christ, which is why imputation and union with Christ belong together.
From the Latin for enfleshing. The claim is not that God appeared as a man, nor that a man was promoted to divinity, but that one person exists in two complete natures. Every christological heresy of the first five centuries is a simplification of this in one direction or the other.
In theory an indulgence remits penalty, not guilt, and never forgiveness itself. In practice, by 1517, it was being sold with promises about souls in purgatory. Luther's theses attack the sale and the theology behind it. Trent later abolished the sale and kept the doctrine.
The central Reformation dispute. Is it a legal declaration on the basis of Christ's righteousness credited to the believer, or the act by which God makes a person actually righteous, begun at baptism and increased through life? Trent and the Reformers meant different things by the word, which is part of why they could not agree. In 1999 the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church signed a Joint Declaration concluding that the condemnations of the sixteenth century no longer apply to the other side's teaching as it is now stated. Not everyone on either side accepts that this settles it.
God's reign, announced by Jesus as arriving in his own ministry.
More about The kingdom of God
The central theme of Jesus' preaching in the synoptics. The scholarly consensus of the last century is that it is both present and future, already begun and not yet finished, which is why the New Testament can speak of it in both tenses without embarrassment.
The hardest pastoral problem of the third century, by a distance. Some had sacrificed. Some had merely bought a certificate. Some had handed over books. Whether and how they could be restored split churches, and it generated the doctrine of penance.
Luther made the distinction a key for reading the whole Bible, arguing that confusing the two destroys assurance. The Reformed tradition adds a third use of the law, as a guide for the Christian life, where Luther pressed hardest on its work of exposing sin. Both are trying to keep grace free without making obedience optional.
Begins with Schleiermacher and runs through the nineteenth century. The aim was to keep faith credible to educated moderns. Barth's judgement, formed by watching his teachers endorse the war in 1914, was that it had ended up talking about humanity in a loud voice.
Every church has one, including the ones that insist they do not. The old tag lex orandi, lex credendi says the rule of prayer forms the rule of belief. That is a claim that what a congregation sings and says shapes what it actually believes, more than the sermon does.
Marcion cut the Old Testament away and pruned the New down to a shortened Luke and ten letters of Paul. The church's rejection of him is one of the most consequential decisions it ever made. The temptation he represents has never gone away.
One, holy, catholic and apostolic. The four adjectives in the creed.
More about The marks of the church
The Reformers added a second set of tests for a true church. The word rightly preached and the sacraments rightly administered, with discipline sometimes as a third. Both lists are attempts to answer the same question, which is how you tell.
The early church treated martyrdom as the fullest form of testimony, and read the martyr's death as conformity to Christ's. It also created problems. The prestige of confessors who survived complicated the question of who could forgive the lapsed, and some enthusiasts had to be talked out of volunteering.
The phrase missio Dei makes the point that mission is God's activity, which the church joins, rather than a programme the church runs. The modern missionary movement from Carey onward is why the world church looks the way it does. Its entanglement with colonial power is part of that account.
Father, Son and Spirit are three modes of one person, not three persons.
More about Modalism
Also called Sabellianism, or in the west patripassianism, because it means the Father suffered on the cross. It is the most common accidental heresy in ordinary preaching. The water, ice and steam illustration falls straight into it, and the clover and the egg fall into the opposite error of making the persons into parts.
It began in the Egyptian desert with Antony and the desert fathers, partly as a substitute for martyrdom once persecution ended. Benedict's rule shaped the western form. Monasteries carried literacy, agriculture, medicine and libraries through the collapse of the western empire.
The opposite error to Nestorianism, and condemned at Chalcedon. The label gets applied loosely and often unfairly. The Oriental Orthodox churches prefer miaphysite, one united nature out of two, and modern dialogue has concluded that a lot of the split was linguistic.
Proposed to win back the churches that had rejected Chalcedon. Maximus the Confessor argued that a nature without a will is not a nature, so a Christ with no human will has not truly become human, and Gethsemane stops making sense. He was mutilated for saying so, and vindicated after his death.
Aquinas held that reason can establish that God is, while what God is like needs revelation. Barth rejected the whole project, partly because he had watched it used to bless German nationalism. It is one of the live disputes of modern theology.
A label Barth disliked. The instinct behind it is that theology has to begin with God's self-disclosure rather than with human religiosity, and it went back to the Reformers and the creeds while still accepting critical scholarship. Barth, Brunner, and differently, Bonhoeffer.
Nestorius objected to Theotokos and wanted the divine and the human kept strictly apart. Whether the historical Nestorius held what was condemned in his name is genuinely disputed. The Church of the East, labelled Nestorian for centuries, has reached agreement with Rome on the substance in modern times.
The creed most churches say on a Sunday. Nicaea in 325, expanded at Constantinople in 381.
More about The Nicene Creed
Strictly it is the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed. The 325 version stopped abruptly after the Holy Spirit and added a set of anathemas against Arian phrases. The 381 revision dropped the anathemas and filled out the article on the Spirit. The filioque is a later western addition and is not in the original text.
Novatian was not obviously wrong about holiness and he still lost. The church judged that it had to have room for the failed. The same instinct comes back with the Donatists, and at various points since.
Augustine's formulation, worked out against Pelagius. It is not the claim that infants are guilty of particular crimes, but that the will is disordered from the start. Eastern theology tends to speak of inherited mortality and corruption rather than inherited guilt, and that is a real difference.
Used for correct doctrine generally, and as the name of the eastern churches. The two senses are connected, because the east has tended to treat worship rather than propositional definition as the thing that carries the faith.
It applies to formal definitions on faith and morals made by the pope speaking as universal pastor, and it has been invoked explicitly very rarely. It is not a claim that the pope cannot be wrong about anything.
Sharing in something that belongs by nature to someone else.
More about Participation
This is the concept doing the heavy lifting in patristic teaching about salvation. A creature can only receive divine life by participation, never possess it by nature. Athanasius' argument against Arius runs straight through it. A Son who himself only participates in God cannot hand participation on to anybody else.
Pelagius was a moral reformer appalled by lax Christians. His argument was that God would not command the impossible. Augustine replied that the will itself needs healing before it can want the good at all. The church sided with Augustine, at Carthage and then at Ephesus.
Christ bears the punishment due to sinners, in their place.
More about Penal substitution
Developed by the Reformers out of earlier substitutionary language, and central to most evangelical accounts of the cross. Critics say it cuts the cross off from the resurrection and can set the Father against the Son. Defenders say the New Testament language of propitiation and curse requires it.
The third century had no ready answer and nearly split over it. Early practice allowed one restoration after grave sin, and that developed into repeated private confession. The medieval system of confession, absolution and satisfaction is where indulgences eventually grew, which is how the question ended up at 1517.
Usually dated from Azusa Street in 1906, though there were earlier stirrings. With the later charismatic movement inside the historic churches, it is the fastest growing form of Christianity in the world, and overwhelmingly a southern hemisphere one.
Held in some form by Augustine, Aquinas, Luther and Calvin alike. It is not a Calvinist invention. Arminians hold it too and define it differently, as God's determination to save those who believe. The divisions are over whether election is unconditional or rests on foreseen faith, and whether there is a matching decree of reprobation. Each side says the other cannot account for something. The Reformed say grace must be sovereign or it is not grace. The Arminian says a choice that could not have gone otherwise is not a choice.
From the Latin for going before. The Second Council of Orange affirmed that even the first stirring of faith is God's gift. Wesley made the idea central, arguing that God gives everyone enough grace to be able to respond, which lets him hold real freedom and total dependence at the same time.
Albert Schweitzer's verdict on the first quest was that each scholar had looked down a deep well and seen his own face. Later quests have been more disciplined, and the third has taken Jesus' Jewishness seriously in a way the first never did.
From the Greek anakephalaiosis, summing up under a head, in Ephesians 1:10. Where Adam disobeyed at a tree, Christ obeys at a tree. Christ passes through every stage of a human life and makes each one holy. It is a way of saying that salvation restores and completes creation rather than replacing it.
Ad fontes was the slogan. Erasmus applied it to the New Testament and found that the Latin Vulgate did not always match the Greek. Humanism handed the Reformation its tools, even where the humanists themselves would not follow the Reformers.
The Christian hope is bodily, and it is corporate, and it has a new creation attached to it. Paul in 1 Corinthians 15 argues that if Christ is not raised then the whole thing collapses, which is an unusually falsifiable claim for a religion to make.
The usual distinction is between general revelation, available in creation and conscience, and special revelation in scripture and above all in Christ. Barth's whole project turns on insisting that revelation comes from God's side, which is why he was so hostile to natural theology.
Irenaeus and Tertullian appeal to it against the gnostics, who could quote scripture freely while telling an entirely different story with it. The rule is not a text set over the Bible. It is the plot of the Bible, held in advance, so that individual verses get read inside it.
The Reformers distinguished it from justification, which happens once and is complete. Keeping the two distinct without separating them is the perennial problem. Calvin's solution was to root both in union with Christ, so that neither can be had without the other.
Anselm argued from the feudal logic of honour and debt. Humanity owes what it cannot pay, God alone can pay it, and the debt is a human one, so whoever pays has to be both. It gets confused with penal substitution constantly, but that is a later and different argument, about punishment rather than honour.
A way of working rather than a set of conclusions, and there were Protestant scholastics as well as Catholic ones. Its reputation for hair splitting is mostly unfair. The disputed question format makes you state the strongest case against yourself before you answer it.
A later and polemical label, coined in the sixteenth century, for the moderate position held in southern Gaul by John Cassian and others, who found Augustine's later teaching on predestination unbearable. The Second Council of Orange in 529 rejected the idea that the first move is human, while declining to follow Augustine all the way.
Regularly misunderstood as scripture only, with tradition thrown out. The Reformers quoted the fathers constantly. The claim is about the final court of appeal, not about ignoring everything else. The version that recognises no authority but a private reading of the Bible is a later and different thing.
Held in various strengths across Christian history, and a major factor in Christian antisemitism. Romans 9 to 11 is the text that will not let the strongest forms stand. Most careful modern theology talks about the church being grafted in rather than Israel being replaced.
Arranging Christian teaching by topic into a coherent whole.
More about Systematic theology
God, creation, humanity, sin, Christ, salvation, church, last things. It asks what the whole of scripture, read together and with the tradition, requires us to say on a given question. The risk is imposing a shape the texts do not have. The risk of not doing it is never saying anything at all.
Genesis 1 and 2 divide the world into regions and then fill them. The tabernacle repeats the pattern in miniature. Courtyard, holy place, most holy place. The prophets and then the New Testament read Christ and the church as the true temple. It is one of the clearest examples of biblical theology at work.
Sometimes called lower criticism. No two ancient manuscripts agree in every detail, so the discipline compares them. The overwhelming majority of variants are spelling and word order. A small number are theologically interesting, and a few passages people know well are almost certainly later additions, including the ending of Mark and the woman taken in adultery. No central doctrine rests on a contested reading, which is a more modest claim than it is usually made to carry.
From the Latin for handing over. Everyone has a tradition. The dispute is whether it stands alongside scripture as a second source, as Trent was read to say, or whether it is the church's accumulated reading of the one source. Newman and the twentieth century ecumenical conversations have narrowed the gap considerably.
The doctrine was not read off a single verse. It was worked out over three centuries as the church tried to say everything the scriptures say about the Father, the Son and the Spirit without contradicting the confession that God is one. The classic formula is one ousia, three hypostases.
The earthly city is built by love of self to the point of contempt for God. The heavenly city by love of God to the point of contempt for self. Neither maps onto any visible institution, and that is the point. The church is not simply the city of God, and the state is not simply its rival.
Central to Calvin, and increasingly recognised as the frame that holds justification and sanctification together rather than letting them compete. The New Testament phrase in Christ, which Paul uses over a hundred times, is the ground of it.
A recurring flashpoint, from Wycliffe and Tyndale through to the Second Vatican Council. Andrew Walls' observation is that Christianity is unusual among world religions in having no sacred original language, and that its translatability is a large part of why it travels.
Transubstantiation holds that the substance changes while the appearances remain. The eastern churches affirm the change and decline the Aristotelian machinery used to explain it. Luther held a real bodily presence in, with and under the elements. Calvin held a real presence by the Spirit, the believer lifted up to the Christ who is in heaven. Zwingli read the words as signifying, and made the supper the church's public pledge of allegiance rather than a bare memorial. Luther and Zwingli failed to agree at Marburg in 1529 and the Protestant world has been divided here ever since.
Associated with Andrew Walls, Lamin Sanneh and Philip Jenkins. The central observation is that Christianity has shifted its centre repeatedly, from Jerusalem to the Mediterranean to northern Europe and now to the global South, and that translation into local languages is what makes that possible.
His ontological argument for the existence of God has been argued over for nine hundred years. Cur Deus Homo reframed the atonement around the satisfaction of honour, and it shaped western thinking about the cross more than any other single book.
Went into the desert, and accidentally started monasticism.
More about Antony of Egypt
He heard the gospel command to sell everything, did it, and withdrew. Athanasius' Life of Antony became a bestseller across the empire and produced imitators everywhere, Augustine among them. Once persecution ended, the desert became a substitute for martyrdom.
He was defending the uniqueness and the otherness of God, not attacking Christ, and he was a serious reader of scripture. Almost everything we have of him comes through hostile sources, which is worth holding on to when reading about him.
His case against Arius is not philosophical but soteriological. Only God can save, and the Son cannot hand on a participation in God that he does not possess by nature himself. He also gives us the first surviving list of the twenty seven New Testament books.
North African, classically trained, nine years a Manichee before he was a Christian, converted at thirty two, bishop for thirty five years. Grace, sin, will, time, memory, the church, the state. Everything the western church argued about afterwards runs through him, including a fair amount he would not have recognised as his.
He wrote On the Holy Spirit, drafted monastic rules still used in the east, and built a hospital complex outside Caesarea for the poor. Theology and practical mercy in the same career, which the tradition has not always managed.
Wrote a short, humane rule that organised European life for a thousand years.
More about Benedict of Nursia
Prayer, work and study in balance, and an abbot bound to consult even the youngest brother. The moderation is the genius of it. Monasteries built on the rule carried literacy, agriculture and medicine through the collapse of the west.
The letter to Corinth steps into a dispute over deposed leaders and argues for order and humility. The letter itself is anonymous. The attribution to Clement comes later. And whether it shows an early Roman primacy or just one large church advising another is still argued.
His personal faith is debated. He was baptised only on his deathbed, which was normal practice at the time and is weak evidence either way. What is not debatable is the effect. Persecution ended, money and buildings arrived, and the church acquired a relationship with coercive power that it has argued about ever since.
He led the African church through the Decian persecution and the mess that followed, argued that the bishops together hold the church's unity, and said there is no salvation outside the church. His disputes with Rome over baptism show that early appeals to Roman authority settled nothing by themselves.
His christology, that the one who was born, suffered and died is the divine Word made flesh, was vindicated at Ephesus and underlies Chalcedon. His methods are a genuine stain. He opened the council before the bishops who disagreed with him had arrived, and he spent heavily at the imperial court afterwards to keep the verdict. He expelled the Jewish community from Alexandria after riots. Whether he bears any responsibility for the murder of the philosopher Hypatia is disputed, and the source that accuses him directly is neither neutral nor contemporary. He later signed a formula of reunion with the Antiochenes that conceded more than his own supporters wanted.
His scholarship exposed the places where the Latin Vulgate had drifted from the Greek. He wanted reform from the inside, and satire rather than schism. He and Luther eventually fought it out in print over the freedom of the will.
The Cost of Discipleship attacks cheap grace, forgiveness without repentance. Life Together came out of an illegal seminary. His prison letters, fragmentary and quoted out of context more often than not, ask what Christianity looks like in a world come of age. Executed at Flossenburg weeks before the end of the war.
He wrote for the cultured despisers of religion, arguing that faith is not first doctrine or morality but a sense of absolute dependence. Whether that rescued Christianity for a sceptical age or hollowed it out is still argued.
Reluctant bishop, brilliant speaker, and the author of the line that what is not assumed is not healed, which is the decisive argument for Christ's full humanity. The east gave him the title The Theologian, and only two others have ever held it.
He argued that because God is infinite, the soul's growth into God never comes to an end, an idea he called epektasis. He also wrote against slavery in terms almost nobody in the ancient world matched.
His Pastoral Rule, on adapting care to different kinds of people, was the standard clergy handbook for centuries. He sent Augustine of Canterbury to Kent in 597. He is often taken as the last of the Latin fathers.
A Northumbrian noblewoman who became a nun in her thirties, she founded and ruled the double monastery at Whitby, housing both men and women under one abbess, a common pattern in the period. Five of her monks went on to become bishops. The herdsman Caedmon, later credited as the first named poet in English, was brought into the community after she recognised his gift. In 664 she hosted the Synod of Whitby, where the Northumbrian church chose Roman practice over the Ionan tradition on the dating of Easter and the shape of the tonsure, a decision that set the English church's trajectory toward Rome. Almost everything known about her comes from Bede's Ecclesiastical History, written decades later by a monk with his own view of how the story should end.
Reformed Zurich on his own, and split with Luther over the supper.
More about Huldrych Zwingli
He read the words this is my body as signifying rather than being, and Luther would not have it. Their failure to agree at Marburg in 1529 kept the Lutheran and Reformed traditions apart. Zwingli died in battle two years later.
He presses the reality of Christ's flesh against docetism, and unity around the bishop against fragmentation. He begs the Roman church not to save him. He also gives us the first use of the phrase catholic church.
He saw that the gnostics were not so much misquoting scripture as putting it inside a different story, and he answered with the rule of faith. One God, one creation, one redemption, summed up in Christ. His account of recapitulation still generates new work.
A Czech preacher influenced by Wycliffe, who attacked corruption among the clergy. His followers pressed for communion in both kinds for the laity, which he endorsed from prison. Luther, accused of being a Hussite, read him afterwards and concluded that he agreed with him.
Translated the Bible into Latin from the original languages, and quarrelled with nearly everyone.
More about Jerome
The Vulgate was the Bible of the western church for a thousand years. His insistence on translating from the Hebrew raised the question of the apocrypha, and he lost that argument to Augustine at the time. Translators now work from the Hebrew as he wanted, Catholic ones included. The canon question went the other way, and Trent defined the disputed books as scripture.
He wrote the first Institutes at twenty six and revised it for the rest of his life. Whether predestination or union with Christ is the controlling idea is argued among his readers, and so is whether his successors developed him or distorted him. He did teach reprobation as well as election. In the trial of Michael Servetus he gave evidence for the prosecution and pressed for conviction, though the sentence was the city council's, and he asked without success for beheading rather than burning.
John Chrysostom c. 347 to 407 · Preacher and bishop
Golden mouth. The greatest preacher of the ancient church, and exiled for saying too much.
More about John Chrysostom
An Antiochene, so his exegesis stays close to the plain sense. His sermons on Matthew, John and the Pauline letters are still read for their pastoral seriousness. He was driven out of Constantinople for criticising the imperial court and died in exile. His sermons against the Jews of Antioch are violent even by the standards of the period, and they were put to terrible use long afterwards.
His argument about images turns on the incarnation. God who could not be depicted has taken visible flesh, so refusing images is a way of being uneasy about that. His Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith is often taken as the close of the patristic age in the east.
An Anglican priest to the end, though his movement left the church after he died. He held prevenient grace and Christian perfection together, and his genius was organisational as much as theological. His brother Charles wrote the hymns.
He attacked clerical wealth, questioned transubstantiation, and set his circle to translating the Bible into English from the Latin. He was condemned decades after his death, when his remains were exhumed and thrown into the river Swift.
He is remembered for Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, which misrepresents him badly. His serious work is on the nature of true religious affections, and on beauty as a category in theology. He owned slaves, which his admirers were slow to say out loud. He was dismissed by his own congregation and died shortly after taking up a college presidency.
Julian of Norwich c. 1343 to after 1416 · Anchoress and mystic
An anchoress who received sixteen visions in a few hours during a near fatal illness, and spent decades writing out what they meant.
More about Julian of Norwich
An anchoress attached to a church in Norwich, where she lived enclosed for decades. Julian is probably not even her own name. It most likely comes from the church of St Julian where she was walled in, and nothing certain is known of her life before that. During a severe illness in 1373 she received sixteen visions of Christ's passion in the course of a few hours. She wrote them up twice, a short text soon afterward and a much longer, more theologically developed one perhaps twenty years later. The Long Text includes the disputed image of Christ as mother, and the repeated assurance that all shall be well, set alongside a serious account of sin rather than instead of one. It is usually called the earliest surviving book in English by a woman, though that claim, like the dating and authorship of the two texts, rests on evidence that is not fully settled.
Justin Martyr c. 100 to c. 165 · Apologist and martyr
A working philosopher who kept the trade after he converted, and died for the faith.
He argued to the emperor that Christians are good citizens, and that whatever is true in philosophy comes from the Word who sows seeds of truth everywhere. His First Apology holds the earliest full description of a Sunday service we have.
His Romans commentary insisted that God is not the highest human value but the one who addresses us from outside. He drafted Barmen against the Nazified church. The Church Dogmatics ran past six million words and was still unfinished when he died.
His Tome gave Chalcedon its language, and he talked Attila out of Rome.
More about Leo the Great
The Tome of Leo states the two natures in one person with unusual clarity for a document written in the heat of a dispute. The bishops at Chalcedon are reported to have said that Peter had spoken through Leo, which the west has quoted ever since.
Macrina the Younger c. 327 to 379 · Teacher and monastic founder
Taught her famous brothers everything, and left nothing of her own in writing.
More about Macrina the Younger
Sister of Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa, and by their account the one who shaped them both. She turned the family estate at Annisa into a monastic community. In his dialogue On the Soul and the Resurrection, Gregory presents her as the calm authority instructing him on death and resurrection, from her own deathbed. Almost everything known about her comes from Gregory's Life of Macrina, a hagiographic text written by a grieving and devoted brother, so the historical woman is harder to recover than the portrait. Even allowing for that, the portrait is substantial enough that she is sometimes called the fourth Cappadocian.
Marcion of Sinope c. 85 to c. 160 · Teacher, expelled
Tried to cut the Old Testament away from Christianity, and was thrown out for it.
More about Marcion of Sinope
He held that the creator God of the Hebrew scriptures was a lesser being than the Father of Jesus, and he produced his own shortened canon. Provoking the church into stating what it did receive may be his largest unintended contribution.
Justification by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, the Bible in German, and a body of hymns still sung. He was also capable of appalling writing about Jews late in life, above all On the Jews and Their Lies in 1543, which the Lutheran churches have had to confront directly.
His argument is that a nature without a will is not a nature, so a Christ with no human will has not truly become human, and Gethsemane becomes a performance. He was mutilated and exiled, and vindicated by a council nineteen years after he died.
He was trying to protect the full humanity of Christ and the impassibility of God. Whether he actually held the doctrine condemned in his name is genuinely disputed. A long defence he wrote in exile, the Bazaar of Heracleides, survived in Syriac and reached western scholars early in the twentieth century, and it has complicated the picture considerably.
He wrote the first systematic theology, defended the faith against Celsus, and produced a vast body of work on scripture. Some of his speculations were condemned centuries after he died. Almost every later father, including his critics, used tools he had made.
A Pharisee of the diaspora. Educated, a Roman citizen, fluent in the scriptures he had been using against the church. His letters come before the gospels, and they are the foundation of most later theology of grace, the law and union with Christ. He is also the most consistently misread writer in the New Testament.
Pelagius c. 354 to c. 420 · British ascetic and teacher
Argued that people can obey God if they choose to, and was condemned.
More about Pelagius
He was a moral reformer, appalled by lax Roman Christians who blamed their weakness on their nature. His logic was that God does not command the impossible. Some of his own writing survives, including a commentary on Paul, but he is mostly read through Augustine, which is not a neutral source.
He drafted the Augsburg Confession and the Loci Communes, and he pressed for agreement where Luther pressed for clarity. His willingness to compromise made him suspect to hardliners on his own side once Luther was dead.
Irenaeus says he was taught by John. The account of his death is usually taken as the earliest martyr act we have. His reply to the demand that he curse Christ, that he has served him eighty six years and Christ has never wronged him, is the line everybody remembers.
Teresa of Avila 1515 to 1582 · Carmelite nun, reformer and mystic
A nun who reformed her own order and wrote her visions down knowing the Inquisition was reading over her shoulder.
More about Teresa of Avila
Granddaughter of a converso forced into public penance by the Inquisition, she entered the Carmelites as a young woman. She later led a reform, the Discalced Carmelites, back toward stricter poverty and prayer. She described her experience of prayer and ecstatic visions in The Interior Castle, and in an autobiography written partly because her confessors ordered it and partly to defend herself. Women who claimed direct experience of God were viewed with particular suspicion in sixteenth century Spain. She was investigated more than once by the Inquisition, and associates close to her were tried by it, though she herself was never condemned. In 1970 she became one of the first two women named a Doctor of the Church.
He coined or fixed trinity, person and substance in Latin, and asked what Athens has to do with Jerusalem while using rhetorical training from Athens to ask it. He ended up among the rigorist Montanists, which fits his temperament.
Grace does not destroy nature but perfects it, and reason can take you some way before revelation is needed. The Summa was left unfinished after an experience he would only describe by saying that everything he had written looked like straw.
His liturgical prose is among the finest in the language, and it was built to be said aloud over and over without wearing out. Under Mary he recanted several times, then withdrew the recantations at the stake and held his right hand in the fire.
His English is so good that much of the King James Version simply keeps it. He worked in exile and in hiding. Strangled and burned near Brussels, praying that God would open the king of England's eyes, which within three years the king's own Bible effectively did.